I went to see Pirate Radio today. (It was called The Boat That Rocked in the UK. Not crazy about the name change but the movie was fantastic.)
As an officer in the United States Army, I'm angry for so many reasons over what happened at Ft. Hood. I'm angry that twelve of my fellow soldiers and a contractor were murdered. I'm angry that over thirty people have suffered life altering injuries from which they will never fully recover. I'm angry that the lives of so many families have been forever ruined. I'm angry that this happened on an Army post on American soil where soldiers should be safe. And I'm angry that the murderer was a terrorist who masqueraded as an Army officer for half a dozen years.
But as angry as I am at what happened, I'm even angrier that it was allowed to happen. Apparently, there was no shortage of warning signs that Hasan identified more with Islamic Jihadists than he did with the US Army. From speeches, writings, conversations, affiliations and postings on Jihadist websites, there were more than enough dots to connect that should have exposed Hasan as someone inclined to attack innocent people in the furtherance of a political, religious and ideological agenda. There were more than enough red flags raised that, at a minimum, should have gotten Hasan kicked out of the Army.But just like September 11, those agencies and individuals charged with keeping America and Americans safe failed to connect the dots that would have saved lives. Jihadist rhetoric espoused by Hasan was categorically dismissed out of submissiveness to the concepts of tolerance and diversity. The Army as an institution has been neutered by decades of political correctness and the leaders in Hasan's chain-of-command failed to act accordingly out of fear of being labeled anti-Muslim and receiving a negative evaluation report. The counter-terrorism agencies knew Hasan was communicating with Al-Qaeda and dismissed it as academic research instead of delving deeper into the probability that a terrorist had infiltrated the ranks.
Even four hours after Hasan stood on a desk yelling Allahu Akbar! and opened fire, the FBI stated that they were not investigating the attack as an act of terrorism even as there were still reports of other gunmen on the loose. Meanwhile, the Army continues to dismiss it as a "tragedy" and an "isolated incident by a lone gunman" while the media has invented the psychological condition of post-traumatic stress disorder by proxy. There is more concern for promoting the appropriate information operation campaign and maintaining the illusion of safety than there is for actually exposing the weaknesses and faults in the system that allowed this to happen. We're even being told that damage to the Army's efforts at diversity would be a greater tragedy than the murder of the twelve soldiers -- how ironic the week of Veterans' Day.
This has nothing to do with being anti-Islamic. After numerous tours to Iraq and working with countless cultural advisors on Ft. Bragg, I know dozens of Muslims who I respect and admire greatly. This has everything to do with force protection and security being trumped by the concepts of political correctness and diversity. This has everything to do with a hypocritical system and culture that breeds timidity and dismissiveness in the interest of career advancement. If I preached a white-supremacist ideology or described Timothy McVeigh as a hero to the cause of freedom and liberty, how long do you think I would still be in the military drawing a salary, receiving educational benefits and getting promoted like Hasan did?
Hasan's radical ideology grew to the point that he committed mass murder because too many leaders were too afraid to lead out of fear of harming their career or the image of the Army. If those leaders don't have the intestinal fortitude, moral conviction or personal courage to stand up, speak up and protect soldiers, then retire, resign or get out of the way and let somebody else do it for you.There you have it. The words as spoken by one angry Army officer. No doubt there are many of them - as well as enlisted personnel - who feel the same.
It seems to me that far too many in America today are worried about being Politically Correct rather than just being Correct and doing the right thing. I hope that something good comes out of this attack. Like maybe watching for the signs, and doing something about it, even if it's just sending the person to a psychiatrist for therapy.
According to the news, the Army will be conducting a Courts Martial against Major Hasan. One of the penalties that can be found in such an action is the death penalty. But in order for such an order to be confirmed, President Obama will have to sign off on it. Anyone want to take bets on whether or not President Obama will actually do the right thing? However, the Courts Martial hasn't yet been convened, so we don't know if that court will sentence him to death,or not. It could be hard labor at Leavenworth.
I'm hoping for the death penalty, to be perfectly honest. This guy is already a waste of space, America doesn't need him to be a waste of money and time in our federal prisons.
And yes, I am aware that some of you may think I want him dead simply because he's a Muslim, or of non-white descent. That would be utter bullshit, as I don't give a damn what someone's religion is, nor what color their skin color is. I want the guy to die for a terrorist attack on one of our bases in which he killed 12 people and wounded 30 more. I want this guy to die for what amounts to treason - which is punishable by death.
I know it may sound heartless and cruel to many of you, but what that man did was also heartless and cruel, and he deserves the same fate as those 12 soldiers.
Until next time...
-Wil
This from the preceding post:
And Dr Collins sees no problem with where aliens might fit in with the belief that man was created in God's image.
"Every creature reflects the goodness and the creativity of God. Humankind, we certainly would argue that we represent that most fully and most completely," he said.
"But all of creation represents God's creativity. So any extraterrestrial being would certainly represent that creativity as well and may be or may not be more developed than we are."
I've long thought that humans make a fundamental mistake in that they arrogantly assume that the universe is all about us. That is why stupid statements like the above are made. We see God as some super human who created a stupendous universe for us to run around sinning in. And, what's more, we are supposedly made in God's image. All the other creatures on this Earth apparently weren't. Only us. Yeah, right. God must be delighted with that one. Think Hitler.
We weren't even around for most of the Earth's history. The first life appeared 4,000 million years ago. Something resembling us (and supposedly God) appeared on the scene 60 thousand years ago. Why did God take so long you may ask? And just when did we acquire a soul? One would think such questions could be easily answered by the men who point to a book written 2,000 years ago for answers. Of course they can't. So I do wonder why they pontificate at such length with such inane garbage that can be easily disproved by anyone who cares to exercise a few brain cells.
Do they really think we're that stupid? Apparently so. I think I need another drink.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/11/13/2742484.htm?section=justin
Alien life is possible: Vatican
Posted
The Pope's chief astronomer has conceded other intelligent beings could exist in outer space.
The conclusion has been drawn by scientific experts called in by the Vatican to study the possibility of extraterrestrial life and its implications for the Church.
It has been four centuries since the Catholic Church locked up Galileo for challenging the belief that the Earth was at the centre of the universe.
The Vatican's five-day conference attracted 30 astronomers, physicists and biologists, including non-Catholics.
It was led by Jesuit priest Father Jose Gabriel Funes, an astronomer and director of the Vatican Observatory.
Father Funes says the possibility of alien life raises "many philosophical and theological implications" but that the gathering was mainly focused on the scientific perspective.
One of the organisers was Chris Impey, a professor of astronomy at the University of Arizona.
He says the aim was to assess the most recent research in the burgeoning field of astrobiology - the study of life in the universe.
"And also getting a sense of when you know the vital breakthrough is going to be made, which is the discovery of life elsewhere," he said.
"Because even though we're looking hard we still only know one planet anywhere with life and that's this one."
Breakthrough coming soon
He says that major breakthrough may be just around the corner.
"If you were going to take a set of bets of the 30 scientists gathered for that meeting, I think most of them would have said on about a time scale of 10 years maybe," he said.
That's a guess from the scientists involved and it could come from either of two directions - it could come from a planetary mission within the solar system that looks at one of the most hospitable places for life nearby which is probably Titan, Europa or Mars.
"Or it could come from telescopic observations of planets that we're finding in increasing numbers around distant stars."
But before one starts looking at the concept through Hollywood eyes, professor Impey has another observation.
"I think there's a big distinction between the finding of microbial life, bacteria or something like that which is actually the most likely form of life to discover initially, and intelligent life - sentient beings with technology, and that's a different strategy," he said.
"So I think on the former, on microbial life it's not likely to challenge the world's major religions - but if we find creatures that rival us or exceed us in intelligence, then I think that's going to be very interesting."
Church's positive response
But perhaps not too interesting, according to Dr Paul Collins, a former priest and now Church historian and Catholic commentator.
He says a belief in extraterrestrial life does not necessarily contradict any basic tenets of the Catholic religion.
"I would think that our response would be a positive one," he said.
"I'm not infallible on this of course, but the reality is that I don't think it does contradict anything within Catholicism.
"Essentially what the Christian faith generally is saying and certainly Catholicism specifically is saying is that God is the ultimate source of life, the ultimate source of reality."
The views of the Catholic Church have shifted radically since the Italian philosopher Giordano Bruno was burned at the stake as a heretic in 1600 for speculating other worlds could be inhabited.
The Vatican Observatory has been at the forefront of efforts to bridge the gap between religion and science and today senior clergy openly endorse scientific ideas such as the big bang theory and evolution.
And Dr Collins sees no problem with where aliens might fit in with the belief that man was created in God's image.
"Every creature reflects the goodness and the creativity of God. Humankind, we certainly would argue that we represent that most fully and most completely," he said.
"But all of creation represents God's creativity. So any extraterrestrial being would certainly represent that creativity as well and may be or may not be more developed than we are."
If you are like me, you don't like your computer saving hidden files all over your hard drive. and if you're a Mac user and you use Safari, I reckon all of you will be surprised to learn that gigabytes of hard drive space is being used up without you even realising it.
I have a really amazing friend in California, she's an artist and also a practicioner of Ayurvedic medicine. When she lived here she gave me some shards of wisdom. Like drinking hot water with lemon in the morning.
Now I've become intrigued by the practice on a deeper level. I know that the practice is from India or South Asia. And they emphasize yoga.
I was reminded by Aubrey about my seasonal habits. I change my environment as the seasons change. I put away my beach photos and put out photos of old snow-covered barns in Vermont. I bust out my maroon fleece pajamas. Blankets get draped over chairs. It is very much like the moon cycles, it's quite a feminine aspect.It's quite a mystery, thought.
It's a mystery to me, though, why I have these cravings. It's not as though it's always warmer in March than it is in November. I have to wonder if humans evolved with the agrarian cycles. Or if it's even more primitive.
So I was pleased to hear that part of Ayurvedic medicine is to encourage people to tune into these seasonal cycles. They also encourage a gluten-free diet. Yay!
Here is my Greenwashing report for the week, I'm using someone else's blog because it's so brilliant. Triple Pundit has a Greenwashing Archive. There's some really funny stories in there. Like the new food labelling project called "Smart Choices".
Their goal is to point to products that are healthy for us. Among their certified cereals? Fruit Loops and Cocoa Crispies. Yeah, take that before your marathon!
And the new Republican stance on CO2: more of it will actually benefit life on Earth! Yes, you can buy back those SUVs now.
On a more practical note, here are 5 ways to green your coffee! :)
Brew Your Own: Eliminate your need for disposable cups and save money in the process by making your own coffee at home- hot or iced. Even better, take the Good Earth Coffee “Brew at Home” Pledge and Good Earth will donate $1 to The Trust for Public Land, a non-profit that works to conserve parks, gardens, and natural places.
Buy Organic, Shade Grown, and/or Fair Trade: Organic coffee is grown without the use of pesticides; shade grown coffee is grown without unnecessary clearing of rainforest, which disrupts bird habitats (shade grown is also sometimes referred to as “Bird-Friendly”); and Fair Trade refers to the practice of providing fair wages and conditions for workers. Ideally, choose a coffee that meets all three standards.
Invest in a Reusable Filter: At this point, I hate buying any product intended for one-time use. Although paper filters can be composted, there is still an environmental cost associated with their production. (Also, I just think the coffee tastes better run through a reusable filter.)
Use a Thermos: Rather than leaving the coffeemaker on “warm”, making multiple pots, or reheating in the microwave, conserve energy by making a day’s worth of coffee and pouring it into a vacuum-sealed thermos. This will ensure that you have a constant supply of hot coffee to keep you going all day.
Compost the Coffee Grounds: Finally, make sure your grounds make it into the compost bin. Or, during the growing season, sprinkle the grounds over flower and vegetable beds as a nitrogen-rich mulch.
Vox used to be such a fun place to blog. But it has become home to several mean-spirited people who think that racism is OK.